Ingenuity, Innovations and competitive profitable Investments is what we're about.

Based on the world trade centre towers collapsed and the north American fire department's report, ISB principal Mohamed Salama, P. Eng., President has spent 4 years in R & D and innovated a revolutionary, unique, safe (fire-resistant and strong pre-engineered paneling structures), affordable (very high net profits), fast-assembled, top quality, zero energy and durable; up 200 years life time retrofit/maintenance/repair free. All required home work to start the huge profitable business is completed and waiting for interested investors' inquiries.

Current built traditional/conventional buildings should not be costly, not safe, not durable.


The ISB Standard
ISB's winning staff and innovative technology, tested pre-engineered structural system, affordable pricing, and network of ISB genius professional engineers are guaranteed to help governments and developers build safe and affordable communities in very short time; resolving the real estate's crisis, avoiding homelessness and lowering the unemployment and energy to almost ZERO.


Our Commitment
ISB is committed to providing all of its governments and developers highest standard of product quality, customer service, and affordable pricing. That's why we offer maintaining the following to all those who invest and be partners with us:
Affordable prices
High net profits

 

PROPERTIES OF STEEL

Lightweight steel obviously will lose its ability to support loads early. To my knowledge, the amount of heat needed to cause failure and collapse has not been reported or well documented, although observations indicate that when heat conditions have extended throughout the majority of the area (in this case, the second floor) and these lightweight steel members are the only means of support, failure will occur, and it could be catastrophic.

 

(4) The obvious deformity of these steel structural members shows that the collapse of this building resulted from the load applied. It is also obvious that the steel framing did not contribute to the fire load. However, if anyone were trapped in this building, rescue would be impossible.

 

The properties of structural steel construction are well documented. Steel is greatly affected by heat. At approximately 400°F, steel begins to lose strength; at 1,200°F, it will have lost more than 60 percent of its strength. Steel can be expected to fail when temperatures are in the proximity of 1,000°F. Steel elongates when heated; a 100-foot steel beam heated to 1,000°F will expand 9 1/2 inches.

The failure rate of steel is affected by the following: the size of the steel member, the load supported by the framing system, the amount of heat exposure (this will vary according to the amount and type of interior finish used to cover the steel framing), and the distance from the steel unit to the fire.

The only protection for the steel is the gypsum board wall covering. The thermal insulation priorities of 1/2-inch gypsum board will not greatly delay the transfer of heat to the framing members. Once the wall stud space inside the wall reaches 500°F, failure is possible. These structural members do not need a great deal of time to be heated to the failure temperature. They lack mass!

The cold-formed steel members have periodic holes punched through the member. The holes, like all penetrations, will allow fire and heat to travel in concealed spaces. Although they may not be directly related to the collapse problem, the penetrations are of concern when checking for extension. These holes will also allow hot fire gases to weaken other steel members. In looking at one of these homes under construction, voids that extended throughout the walls were noted. Fire can easily travel to the attic once it enters a concealed space.

 




THE DANGERS OF LIGHTWEIGHT STEEL CONSTRUCTION
06/01/2006

BY KARL K. THOMPSON (the danger of using light weight steel STUDS in buildings constructions).

Why the world trade centre towers collapsed!
Stanford Report, December 5, 2001

Structural engineer describes collapse of the World Trade Center towers
BY MARK SHWARTZ


"The damaged columns held up the weight of the building, so logic would dictate that the building would fall," said Hamburger, "but that didn't happen. Because of its great structural redundancy, the load was distributed to other parts of the building. We have reason to believe that, without the fire, the buildings could have stood indefinitely and been repaired. But we did have a fire."

 

Born of fire

Hamburger noted that the fuel in both jetliners burned off rapidly, despite media reports that the aircraft continued burning long after the crash.

"The impact probably caused a failure of the fireproofing in the affected areas," he said. "We think that the fuel ignited several floors in the building," he added, which had a devastating effect on the steel support beams.

"Steel is born of fire," Hamburger explained. "As it's reheated, it expands and loses its rigidity. Above 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it loses a significant amount of its strength."

He said the extreme heat from the fires might have caused the steel floors to expand and bow, which may have caused the support columns to bend inward and buckle. Heat also may have caused the steel flooring to separate from the columns, or the columns themselves may have heated up and buckled outward.

Hamburger and his colleagues have not yet determined which of these scenarios occurred on Sept. 11, but there is little doubt that the collapse of the upper floors of the WTC towers brought down both structures.

"Think of the impact of dropping a 25-story building straight down," Hamburger told the audience. "It was like a pile driver, which is why it collapsed as it did."

 

Vulnerabilities

While acknowledging the many innovations that went into the design of the WTC towers in the 1960s -- including one of the earliest applications of computer stress analysis -- Hamburger also cited several features that made the buildings vulnerable to the intense fires that ultimately caused their collapse.

"The floor trusses [joists] were relatively flimsy. As the tower collapsed, the trusses just fell apart," he observed, noting that trusses are difficult to fireproof.

Hamburger noted that each tower was constructed using a novel tube frame system designed to resist winds of up to 80 miles per hour. But the connections of the tube frame were weak, causing them to break apart and become three-pronged missiles that crashed into the street and into nearby buildings.

Hamburger also discussed the collapse of WTC Building 7, which housed the offices of Con Edison, the FBI and the CIA.

"WTC-7 was a 47-story building and became a two-story pile of rubble," Hamburger said, "making it the first major structure in the United States to collapse because of fire."

 

Future designs

He pointed out that fires frequently occur in high-rise buildings and noted that between 1994 and 1998, 30 fires occurred in the United States in buildings that were 50 stories or taller.

"The question is, should fire protection standards be changed in some significant way in the aftermath of Sept. 11," Hamburger asked, "and should structural engineering designs include consideration of fire load and the response of structures? Right now, structural engineers know very little about fire."


 
Why utilize my ISB unique buildings technology to resolve the BC Real Estate Crisis!
 
 
Why not build better, safe, faster, and cheaper?  Why not make your business more efficient and profitable?  Why not increase your customers’ satisfaction and decrease their costs and your own, including zero repair bill along 200 year buildings life time?  Why not put ISB’s innovative technology, factories, and professional services to work for you?

Perhaps you have a few questions of your own.  The good folks at ISB are standing by with answers.  

 

Innovative Steel Buildings Inc. unique building technology (www.innovativesteelbuildings.com) is the only alternative to the following problems:

Structural engineer describes collapse of the World Trade Center towers

BY MARK SHWARTZ

 

"The damaged columns held up the weight of the building, so logic would dictate that the building would fall," said Hamburger, "but that didn't happen. Because of its great structural redundancy, the load was distributed to other parts of the building. We have reason to believe that, without the fire, the buildings could have stood indefinitely and been repaired. But we did have a fire."

Born of fire

Hamburger noted that the fuel in both jetliners burned off rapidly, despite media reports that the aircraft continued burning long after the crash.

"The impact probably caused a failure of the fireproofing in the affected areas," he said. "We think that the fuel ignited several floors in the building," he added, which had a devastating effect on the steel support beams.

"Steel is born of fire," Hamburger explained. "As it's reheated, it expands and loses its rigidity. Above 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, it loses a significant amount of its strength."

He said the extreme heat from the fires might have caused the steel floors to expand and bow, which may have caused the support columns to bend inward and buckle. Heat also may have caused the steel flooring to separate from the columns, or the columns themselves may have heated up and buckled outward.

All the evidence so far points to a combination of the impact and the fires as the cause of the collapse; we must now ask what we can do in the future to prevent another failure like this one. Some believe that nothing can, or should, be done. Hyman Brown, the WTC construction manager, believes that "nothing is designed or will be designed to withstand that [kind of] fire." Dr. Graubner feels that the "building(s) performed completely according to plan in the case of catastrophe," which can be seen by the number of people who were able to evacuate from the two towers while they still stood. The remaining buildings of the World Trade Center (Fig. 2), some of which remained standing until September 15th, were able to be completely evacuated before their respective collapses, as they were designed.

Conclusion

In the past, designers had no need to accommodate for terrorist attacks from the air, but now that this threat is a reality, designers are looking for reasonable ways to protect our high-rises. It appears that to truly be safe, a building must be able to withstand a great impact without losing structural integrity, as well as defend itself against fires and explosions. At this time, atomic energy plants are the only buildings designed to be completely invulnerable to plane crashes. Even the jet fuel released by a wrecked plane is not able to penetrate the thick layers of concrete surrounding a plant [7]. High-rise buildings could be designed like nuclear power plants to protect them from aerial attacks, but the expense required makes this an unreasonable solution [11].
Perhaps buildings can be made more resistant with redundant systems in which the structure will not collapse if a few columns are destroyed by an impact or explosion. Perhaps high-rise buildings should have backup fire protection systems in case the primary system is disabled for some reason. Ultimately buildings will have to focus more on robust construction and emergency precautions and less on aesthetic appeal. Of course, if the World Trade Center is going to be rebuilt, which many say it will, the new buildings will have to be as aesthetically pleasing as their predecessors; they will be replacing the two most famous buildings in the infamous New York skyline.
 
 
Innovative Steel Buildings Inc. unique building technology (www.innovativesteelbuildings.com) is the only alternative to the following problems:
 
Canada

Vancouver mayor on housing crisis: 'I never dreamed it would get this intense'

Gregor Robertson’s platform in 2008 vowed affordable housing and an end to homelessness. Eight years and three terms later, the city’s housing market is in a perilous place – and has forced the mayor to get creative